Search for: "JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10" Results 1 - 20 of 181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
Commonly this person is identified as `John Doe’ or `Jane Doe’.The District Court Judge began her opinion by explaining that Uber Technologies, Inc. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
I've recently started looking into anonymous "John Doe" (or "Jane Doe") litigation; generally speaking, people are presumptively required to sue in their own names, but sometimes courts allow them to sue anonymously. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:29 am by Andrew Sykes
In fact, I will repeat the same example I made up in that post: John and Jane Doe own the following: House $150,000 Checking and savings $50,000 Investment account $200,000 Jane’s IRA $100,000 John’s IRA $150,000 John’s whole life policy $25,000 (both face value and cash surrender value) If John enters a nursing home and applies for Medicaid, the following items are exempt: their house, Jane’s IRA (exempt… [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Doe will file under seal within ten (10) days of the date of this Order a disclosure of the identity of any other party or entity (other than his family and Jane Roe) who may have a direct interest in the outcome of the litigation. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
But federal courts generally view Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a) as presumptively barring pseudonymous litigation, so the federal judge (Judge James Gwin) on his own initiative required the parties to explain why they should remain anonymous—and ultimately concluded that they had to be identified: On March 12, 2020, Plaintiff John Doe sued Defendant Jane Doe in the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 10:35 am by Angelina Cameron
To help you better understand how to complete Form 1040, we’ll use the example of John Doe and Jane Doe. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:37 pm
Plaintiff also charges defendants with intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, cyberstalking and violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.Plaintiff:Jan E KruskaDefendant:Perverted Justice Foundation Incorporated.Org, Xavier Von Erck, Christopher Brocious, Barabara W Ochoa, Filmax Inc., April Butler, David M Butler, GoDaddy.com, Bob Parsons, MySpace.com, Jane Does, John Does, Limited Liability Companies and Black and White… [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs, John and Jane Doe 1, make claims on behalf of Child Doe 1, as an immunocompromised student, plus claims for a class of similarly situated students. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Yarbrough (D.N.M.): … Plaintiff filed her complaint under the pseudonym "Jane Doe. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Trump Spent $10 Million From His PAC on His Legal Bills Last Year DNyuz – Maggie Haberman (New York Times) | Published: 2/21/2023 Former President Trump spent roughly $10 million from his PAC, Save America, on his own legal fees last year. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
McDonald Family Foundation Distinguished Professor, Emory University, USA 10:30-11 a.m. [read post]